Birmingham City Council v Fellows [2017] EW Misc 7 (CC) (20 April 2017)
Given the deliberate nature of the breach, the history of repeated violations, and the ineffectiveness of previous suspended and immediate custodial sentences, a custodial sentence of sixty days is warranted to take effect upon Mr. Fellows' release from prison.
- Citation
- [2017] EW Misc 7 (CC)
- Parties
- Defendant: Mr. Fellows; Claimant: The Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 April 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt of Court Proceedings / Sentencing After Admission of Breach
- Outcome
- Defendant sentenced to sixty days imprisonment for contempt, to take effect upon release from current prison term; order for costs contribution made.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Injunction, Sentencing for Contempt
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr. Fellows
Defendant
The Council
Claimant
Procedural Posture
Contempt of Court Proceedings / Sentencing After Admission of Breach
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr. Fellows breached the exclusion order on 2nd March 2017
- 2 Appropriate sanction for the admitted breach
Ratio Decidendi
Given the deliberate nature of the breach, the history of repeated violations, and the ineffectiveness of previous suspended and immediate custodial sentences, a custodial sentence of sixty days is warranted to take effect upon Mr. Fellows' release from prison.
Court Disposition
Defendant sentenced to sixty days imprisonment for contempt, to take effect upon release from current prison term; order for costs contribution made.
Orders
- Sixty days imprisonment to take effect upon Mr. Fellows' release from prison.
- Defendant to pay £400 towards Claimant's costs, not to be enforced without further order of the court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment