FINBARR O’CONNELL & Ors v LPE SUPPORT LIMITED (IN COMPULSORY LIQUIDATION)
The assignment was void for want of authority because it was executed without board approval, was contrary to LOG's interests, and both signatories knew of the lack of authority, with their knowledge attributable to LPE Support.
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr Finbarr O’Connell; Applicant: Mr Adam Henry Stephens; Applicant: Mr Colin Hardman; Applicant: Mr Lane Bednash; Respondent: LPE Support Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 July 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Assignment declared void for want of authority; attendant relief granted.
- Legal Topics
- Director Authority, Fiduciary Duty, Assignment of Rights, Ratification, Transaction at Undervalue
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Finbarr O’Connell
Applicant
Mr Adam Henry Stephens
Applicant
Mr Colin Hardman
Applicant
Mr Lane Bednash
Applicant
LPE Support Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Insolvency Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the assignment by LOG to LPE Support was void for want of authority
- 2 Whether the assignment was a transaction at an undervalue under s.238 Insolvency Act 1986
Ratio Decidendi
The assignment was void for want of authority because it was executed without board approval, was contrary to LOG's interests, and both signatories knew of the lack of authority, with their knowledge attributable to LPE Support.
Court Disposition
Assignment declared void for want of authority; attendant relief granted.
Orders
- Assignment dated 28 April 2017 by LOG to LPE Support declared void.
- Attendant relief as sought by applicants granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment