G v S (Family Law Act 1996: publicity)
In FLA 1996 non-molestation proceedings involving allegations of domestic abuse, the default position is confidentiality. Section 12 AJA 1960 does not apply to these proceedings as they do not relate wholly or mainly to the maintenance or upbringing of a child. The applicant must seek the court’s permission to publish information. In this case, the respondent’s Article 8 rights to privacy outweigh the applicant’s Article 10 rights to freedom of expression and the public interest in publication. Permission to publish is refused.
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr G; Respondent: Ms S
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Act 1996 Non Molestation Order Application / Judgment on Application for Permission to Publish Information About Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application for permission to publish information about the proceedings refused
- Legal Topics
- Non Molestation Orders, Publicity of Family Proceedings, Confidentiality, Article 8 ECHR, Article 10 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr G
Applicant
Ms S
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Act 1996 Non Molestation Order Application / Judgment on Application for Permission to Publish Information About Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant may publicly discuss the proceedings and evidence filed in a Family Law Act 1996 non-molestation order case
- 2 Whether section 12 of the Administration of Justice Act 1960 applies to these proceedings
- 3 Whether an implied undertaking of confidentiality arises in FLA 1996 non-molestation proceedings involving allegations of domestic abuse
Ratio Decidendi
In FLA 1996 non-molestation proceedings involving allegations of domestic abuse, the default position is confidentiality. Section 12 AJA 1960 does not apply to these proceedings as they do not relate wholly or mainly to the maintenance or upbringing of a child. The applicant must seek the court’s permission to publish information. In this case, the respondent’s Article 8 rights to privacy outweigh the applicant’s Article 10 rights to freedom of expression and the public interest in publication. Permission to publish is refused.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to publish information about the proceedings refused
Orders
- The applicant is not permitted to publish information about the proceedings or evidence filed by the parties.
- Anonymity of the children and family members must be strictly preserved in any published version of the judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment