Foreman v Williams [2017] EWHC 3370 (QB) (21 December 2017)
Relief from sanctions was granted as the Claimant's failures were caused by the Defendant's deliberate avoidance of proceedings. The trial proceeded in the Defendant's absence as he had notice and opportunity to participate. Damages were assessed based on medical evidence, care needs, loss of earnings, and other heads of loss, resulting in a total award of £99,449.08 to the Claimant.
- Citation
- [2017] EWHC 3370 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr Michael Foreman; Defendant: Mr Graham Williams
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Quantum Only / Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; judgment for Claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Quantum of Damages, Relief From Sanctions, Default Judgment, Assessment of Damages, Personal Injury Compensation, Care Claims, Loss of Earnings, Smith V Manchester Award
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Michael Foreman
Claimant
Mr Graham Williams
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Quantum Only / Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether relief from sanctions should be granted for late service of documents
- 2 Whether the trial should proceed in the absence of the Defendant
- 3 Assessment of quantum for personal injuries and related losses
Ratio Decidendi
Relief from sanctions was granted as the Claimant's failures were caused by the Defendant's deliberate avoidance of proceedings. The trial proceeded in the Defendant's absence as he had notice and opportunity to participate. Damages were assessed based on medical evidence, care needs, loss of earnings, and other heads of loss, resulting in a total award of £99,449.08 to the Claimant.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; judgment for Claimant.
Orders
- Defendant to pay Claimant £99,449.08 in damages and interest.
- Defendant to pay Claimant's costs on the standard basis, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment