N (A Child)
The judge was entitled to embark on a fact-finding hearing and to find that the appellant, his wife, and the mother remained in the pool of potential perpetrators; there was no procedural unfairness; the findings regarding neglectful delay in seeking medical treatment were justified by the evidence; the appeal is dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr H; First Respondent: Birmingham City Council; Second Respondent: YW (the mother)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Fact Finding Hearing in Care Proceedings
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Fact Finding Hearings, Non Accidental Injury, Care Proceedings, Potential Perpetrators, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr H
Appellant
Birmingham City Council
First Respondent
YW (the mother)
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Fact Finding Hearing in Care Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge erred in embarking on a fact-finding hearing when the perpetrator could not be identified
- 2 Whether the fact-finding hearing was unfair to the appellant
- 3 Whether the appellant and his wife should remain in the pool of potential perpetrators
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was entitled to embark on a fact-finding hearing and to find that the appellant, his wife, and the mother remained in the pool of potential perpetrators; there was no procedural unfairness; the findings regarding neglectful delay in seeking medical treatment were justified by the evidence; the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment