McGIll v Huang & Ors
Mr Huang is liable to account to the partnership for £1,496 from Vivo 1 as he had sufficient control over that sum and failed to prove proper administrative outlay for the full amount. The partnership was dissolved by Mr Huang's clear notice on 6 December 2016. Mr Huang is not liable to account for profits from Vivo 3 as a post-dissolution agreement existed whereby Mr McGill and Mr Bracewell would only look to Mr Wilkinson for any share of commission, and all partners consented to this arrangement, releasing Mr Huang from further fiduciary duty regarding Vivo 3.
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr Anthony McGill; Defendant: Mr Haizhe Huang; Defendant: Mr Barry Wilkinson; Defendant: Mr Paul Bracewell
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 January 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Partnership Dispute / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Partially in favour of claimant; Mr Huang to account for £1,496 from Vivo 1; partnership dissolved; no account required for Vivo 3 profits.
- Legal Topics
- Partnership Dissolution, Fiduciary Duties, Accounting for Partnership Profits, Agency, Goodwill, Post Dissolution Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Anthony McGill
Claimant
Mr Haizhe Huang
Defendant
Mr Barry Wilkinson
Defendant
Mr Paul Bracewell
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Partnership Dispute / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Huang is liable to account for sums due from Vivo 1 to the partnership
- 2 Whether the partnership was dissolved by Mr Huang's email of 6 December 2016
- 3 Whether Mr Huang is liable to account for profits from Vivo 3 to the partnership
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Huang is liable to account to the partnership for £1,496 from Vivo 1 as he had sufficient control over that sum and failed to prove proper administrative outlay for the full amount. The partnership was dissolved by Mr Huang's clear notice on 6 December 2016. Mr Huang is not liable to account for profits from Vivo 3 as a post-dissolution agreement existed whereby Mr McGill and Mr Bracewell would only look to Mr Wilkinson for any share of commission, and all partners consented to this arrangement, releasing Mr Huang from further fiduciary duty regarding Vivo 3.
Court Disposition
Partially in favour of claimant; Mr Huang to account for £1,496 from Vivo 1; partnership dissolved; no account required for Vivo 3 profits.
Orders
- Mr Huang to pay £1,496 to the partnership in respect of Vivo 1 proceeds.
- Declaration that the partnership was dissolved on 6 December 2016.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment