Plymouth Community Homes Ltd v Hammond [2026] EWCC 27 (05 May 2026)
The court has power under rule 70.2A of the Civil Procedure Rules to authorise the landlord to force or change the locks to gain access where a tenant has failed to comply with an access injunction, provided the landlord acts proportionately, gives proper notice, secures the property, and provides the tenant with a new key if locks are changed. This does not constitute trespass or breach of quiet enjoyment as the right of access is expressly and impliedly part of the tenancy. The order is not an amendment of the injunction but an enforcement mechanism following non-compliance.
- Citation
- [2026] EWCC 27
- Parties
- Claimant: Plymouth Community Homes Limited; Defendant: Mr Lee Hammond
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Enforce Access Injunction / Post Injunction Enforcement Hearing
- Outcome
- Application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Access Injunctions, Enforcement of Court Orders, Tenancy Rights, Rule 70.2 a CPR, Quiet Enjoyment, Landlord's Right of Entry
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plymouth Community Homes Limited
Claimant
Mr Lee Hammond
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application to Enforce Access Injunction / Post Injunction Enforcement Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has power to authorise forced entry by a landlord to enforce an access injunction under rule 70.2A of the Civil Procedure Rules
- 2 Whether such an order is compatible with common law and the terms of the tenancy agreement
- 3 Whether the court should exercise its discretion to grant the order sought
Ratio Decidendi
The court has power under rule 70.2A of the Civil Procedure Rules to authorise the landlord to force or change the locks to gain access where a tenant has failed to comply with an access injunction, provided the landlord acts proportionately, gives proper notice, secures the property, and provides the tenant with a new key if locks are changed. This does not constitute trespass or breach of quiet enjoyment as the right of access is expressly and impliedly part of the tenancy. The order is not an amendment of the injunction but an enforcement mechanism following non-compliance.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part
Orders
- Claimant authorised under rule 70.2A CPR to enforce the injunction by forcing or changing the locks after giving the Defendant not less than 48 hours written notice, securing the property, and providing a new key if locks are changed.
- Order to be personally served on the Defendant, with verbal and written explanation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment