Plymouth Community Homes Limited v Lee Hammond
The court has power under rule 70.2A of the Civil Procedure Rules to authorise the landlord to force or change the locks to gain access where the tenant has failed to comply with an access injunction, provided the landlord acts reasonably, gives proper notice, secures the property, and provides the tenant with a new key. This enforcement mechanism does not offend common law or the terms of the tenancy, and is a proportionate means of securing compliance with essential safety obligations.
- Parties
- Claimant: Plymouth Community Homes Limited; Defendant: Mr Lee Hammond
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (landlord and Tenant) / Application to Enforce Access Injunction
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Enforcement of Injunctions, Access to Let Premises, Rule 70.2 a Civil Procedure Rules, Quiet Enjoyment, Contractual Rights of Entry
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Plymouth Community Homes Limited
Claimant
Mr Lee Hammond
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (landlord and Tenant) / Application to Enforce Access Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has power to authorise forced entry by landlord to enforce access injunction under rule 70.2A Civil Procedure Rules
- 2 Whether such an order is consistent with common law and the tenancy agreement
- 3 Whether the act required by the injunction can be performed by the landlord in the event of tenant's non-compliance
Ratio Decidendi
The court has power under rule 70.2A of the Civil Procedure Rules to authorise the landlord to force or change the locks to gain access where the tenant has failed to comply with an access injunction, provided the landlord acts reasonably, gives proper notice, secures the property, and provides the tenant with a new key. This enforcement mechanism does not offend common law or the terms of the tenancy, and is a proportionate means of securing compliance with essential safety obligations.
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part
Orders
- Claimant authorised under rule 70.2A CPR to enforce the injunction by forcing or changing the locks after giving the Defendant not less than 48 hours written notice, securing the property, and providing a new key at no charge if locks are changed.
- Order to be personally served on the Defendant with verbal and written explanation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment