Malcolm Ford v The Scottish Ministers
The tribunal erred in its approach to detriment and causation for the section 47B ERA claims by failing to explain why secondment was not a detriment and by not applying the correct material influence test; the appeal is allowed on these grounds and remitted for reconsideration. The tribunal did not err in finding the dismissal was for conduct and not for making protected disclosures; the appeal on unfair dismissal grounds is refused.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Malcolm Ford; Respondent: The Scottish Ministers
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part, refused in part
- Legal Topics
- Protected Disclosures, Unfair Dismissal, Detriment, Causation, Whistleblowing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Malcolm Ford
Appellant
The Scottish Ministers
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was subjected to detriment for making protected disclosures under section 47B ERA
- 2 Whether the appellant's dismissal was unfair or automatically unfair under sections 98 and 103A ERA
- 3 Whether the tribunal applied the correct legal test for causation and detriment
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal erred in its approach to detriment and causation for the section 47B ERA claims by failing to explain why secondment was not a detriment and by not applying the correct material influence test; the appeal is allowed on these grounds and remitted for reconsideration. The tribunal did not err in finding the dismissal was for conduct and not for making protected disclosures; the appeal on unfair dismissal grounds is refused.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part, refused in part
Orders
- Appeal allowed on grounds 1 and 2 (detriment claims under section 47B ERA) and remitted to the same tribunal for reconsideration of specified issues including time bar and remedy.
- Appeal refused on grounds 3 and 4 (unfair dismissal claims).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment