Kebbell & Anor v Hat & Mitre PLC & Ors (As Joint Administrators of Hat & Mitre PLC)
The court held that even if the directors acted for an improper purpose, the appointment of administrators is not a nullity but voidable only by court order under the Insolvency Act 1986 Schedule B1. The applicants failed to establish that the directors' purpose was improper or that the administrators acted unfairly. The administrators properly considered all stakeholders, and the applicants' delay and engagement with the administration weighed against granting relief.
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr Martyn Kebbell; Applicant: Mr Richard Kitchen; Respondent: Hat & Mitre PLC; Respondent: Richard Toone; Respondent: Jason Maloney
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency Application / Judgment After Contested Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Improper Purpose in Director Appointments, Administrator Appointment Validity, Unfair Harm Under Administration, Directors' Duties Under Companies Act, Relief Under Schedule B1 Insolvency Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Martyn Kebbell
Applicant
Mr Richard Kitchen
Applicant
Hat & Mitre PLC
Respondent
Richard Toone
Respondent
Jason Maloney
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Insolvency Application / Judgment After Contested Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appointment of administrators was invalid due to improper purpose under s.171(b) Companies Act 2006
- 2 Whether the administrators' conduct caused unfair harm to the applicants as members under paragraph 74 of Schedule B1 Insolvency Act 1986
- 3 Whether the administrators should have accepted the Kebbell/Kitchen proposal to end administration
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that even if the directors acted for an improper purpose, the appointment of administrators is not a nullity but voidable only by court order under the Insolvency Act 1986 Schedule B1. The applicants failed to establish that the directors' purpose was improper or that the administrators acted unfairly. The administrators properly considered all stakeholders, and the applicants' delay and engagement with the administration weighed against granting relief.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment