Heating Trade Supplies Group Ltd & Anor v Matteo & Anor [2022] EWHC 1070 (Ch) (06 May 2022)

Heating Trade Supplies Group Ltd & Anor v Matteo & Anor [2022] EWHC 1070 (Ch) (06 May 2022)

The court found that the £1 million advanced by Mr Baldudak was a loan, not an investment for shares, based on contemporaneous documents and conduct. Mr Matteo does not have a beneficial interest in HTS shares beyond what was formally transferred. Mr Matteo breached fiduciary duties by misappropriating company...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] EWHC 1070 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Mr Baldudak; Claimant: Heating Trade Supplies Group Ltd; Respondent: Mr Matteo
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 May 2022
Procedural Posture
Company Law Dispute / Final Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Claimants succeed; respondent's counterclaims dismissed.
Legal Topics
Share Ownership, Directors' Duties, Unfair Prejudice, Director's Loan Account, Injunctions, Beneficial Ownership, Fiduciary Duty, Employment Termination
Company Law Equity Contract Law Share Ownership Directors' Duties Unfair Prejudice Director's Loan Account Injunctions +3 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Baldudak

Claimant

Heating Trade Supplies Group Ltd

Claimant

Mr Matteo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Company Law Dispute / Final Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether £1 million advanced by Mr Baldudak was a loan or investment for shares
  2. 2 Whether Mr Matteo has a beneficial interest in HTS shares and how many
  3. 3 Whether Mr Matteo breached fiduciary duties as director

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the £1 million advanced by Mr Baldudak was a loan, not an investment for shares, based on contemporaneous documents and conduct. Mr Matteo does not have a beneficial interest in HTS shares beyond what was formally transferred. Mr Matteo breached fiduciary duties by misappropriating company assets and setting up a competing company. His removal as director was procedurally unlawful but justified due to his conduct. Mr Matteo owes HTS £144,043.12 on his director's loan account. Claims for deferred salary, dividends, rent, and assault fail. HTS is entitled to an injunction restraining Mr Matteo from interfering in its business.

Court Disposition

Claimants succeed; respondent's counterclaims dismissed.

Orders

  • Mr Matteo to repay £144,043.12 to HTS
  • Injunction granted restraining Mr Matteo from interfering in HTS business, attending premises, or claiming connection