Lowe v Governors of Sutton's Hospital in Charterhouse [2025] EWCA Civ 857 (10 July 2025)
The statutory purpose of the prescribed information regime is fulfilled where a reasonable recipient would understand the information provided, even if there are obvious errors in clause references or the absence of a signed certificate, provided the tenant is given sufficient information about the circumstances in which the deposit may be retained and the landlord's confirmation is authenticated by a signed covering letter.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCA Civ 857
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Merryck Lowe; Respondents: The Governors of Sutton's Hospital in Charterhouse
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Tenancy Deposit Protection, Assured Shorthold Tenancy, Statutory Interpretation, Prescribed Information Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Merryck Lowe
Appellant
The Governors of Sutton's Hospital in Charterhouse
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Article 2(1)(g)(vi) of the Housing (Tenancy Deposits) (Prescribed Information) Order 2007 is satisfied by reference to a clause in a tenancy agreement not attached and with incorrect clause numbering
- 2 Whether Article 2(1)(g)(vii) is satisfied if a covering letter is signed by the landlord but the enclosed certificate is not signed and the tenant has not had opportunity to confirm accuracy before certification
- 3 Whether the Information Ground can be relied upon when not pleaded
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory purpose of the prescribed information regime is fulfilled where a reasonable recipient would understand the information provided, even if there are obvious errors in clause references or the absence of a signed certificate, provided the tenant is given sufficient information about the circumstances in which the deposit may be retained and the landlord's confirmation is authenticated by a signed covering letter.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No breach of prescribed information requirements found
- No statutory penalty payable by landlord
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment