Jones v Lawton [2013] EWHC 4108 (QB) (20 December 2013)
The defendant was primarily liable for failing to take proper precautions when turning right across slow-moving traffic and not being alert to the possibility of a motorcycle approaching, but the claimant was contributorily negligent for riding at excessive speed and failing to keep a proper lookout. Liability is...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] EWHC 4108
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr Philip Jones; Defendant: Mr Michael John Lawton
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Road Traffic Accident / Trial on Liability Only
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimant with a reduction for contributory negligence; judgment for the defendant on one third of the counterclaim.
- Legal Topics
- Contributory Negligence, Road Traffic Accidents, Apportionment of Liability
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Philip Jones
Claimant
Mr Michael John Lawton
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Road Traffic Accident / Trial on Liability Only
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant was negligent in emerging from a side road into the path of the claimant's motorcycle
- 2 Whether the claimant was contributorily negligent by riding at excessive speed and failing to keep a proper lookout
- 3 Apportionment of liability between the parties
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant was primarily liable for failing to take proper precautions when turning right across slow-moving traffic and not being alert to the possibility of a motorcycle approaching, but the claimant was contributorily negligent for riding at excessive speed and failing to keep a proper lookout. Liability is apportioned two-thirds to the claimant and one-third to the defendant.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimant with a reduction for contributory negligence; judgment for the defendant on one third of the counterclaim.
Orders
- Claimant to recover two-thirds of his claim, damages to be assessed.
- Defendant to recover one-third of his counterclaim, damages to be assessed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment