Tewksbury Borough Council v Keeley & Ors
The mobile shed is not a building for planning purposes because it is not attached to the land and can be freely moved. The assembly of its parts on site did not constitute a building operation or development under section 55(1) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. The main factor is its mobility and lack of physical attachment.
- Parties
- Claimant: Tewksbury Borough Council; Defendant: Mr Michael Keeley; Defendant: Mrs Karen Adams
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Injunction / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- injunction granted in agreed terms, no order regarding assembled mobile shed
- Legal Topics
- Definition of Development, Status of Mobile Structures, Building Operations, Planning Permission Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tewksbury Borough Council
Claimant
Mr Michael Keeley
Defendant
Mrs Karen Adams
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Injunction / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the assembly and placement of mobile sheds constitutes 'development' under section 55(1) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
- 2 Whether the mobile sheds are 'buildings' for planning purposes
- 3 Whether planning permission is required for the mobile sheds
Ratio Decidendi
The mobile shed is not a building for planning purposes because it is not attached to the land and can be freely moved. The assembly of its parts on site did not constitute a building operation or development under section 55(1) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. The main factor is its mobility and lack of physical attachment.
Court Disposition
injunction granted in agreed terms, no order regarding assembled mobile shed
Orders
- Order in agreed terms between parties
- No order in respect of the assembled mobile shed on site
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment