Cheshire East Borough Council v Maloney & Ors [2021] EWHC 350 (QB) (16 February 2021)

Cheshire East Borough Council v Maloney & Ors [2021] EWHC 350 (QB) (16 February 2021)

Mr Maloney was found in contempt of court for deliberate and knowing breaches of interim injunctions by encouraging and allowing prohibited development and additional caravans, with no credible excuse. The appropriate and proportionate injunction is to limit occupation to the eight caravans present at the time of the first order, not to reward disobedience by allowing the later five caravans to remain.

Citation
[2021] EWHC 350
Parties
Claimant: Cheshire East Borough Council; Defendant: Mr Michael Maloney; Defendant: Mrs Sheila Maloney; Defendant: Mr Michael Maloney Senior; Defendant: Ms Bridget Maloney; Defendant: Ms Helen Lisa Maloney; Defendant: Persons Unknown Depositing Hardcore, Bringing Caravans and Residentially Occupying the Land on the South Side of Broadoak Lane, Mobberley, Knutsford, Cheshire; Defendant: Total Plant Hire; Defendant: Mr Thomas Haligan; Defendant: W Doherty & Sons Ltd; Defendant: Mr Paul Rennie; Defendant: Mr Glyn Parr; Defendant: Mr Adrian Draper
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 February 2021
Procedural Posture
Committal and Injunction Proceedings / Judgment After Contested Hearing on Contempt and Injunctive Relief
Outcome
Mr Maloney found in contempt of court on multiple allegations; terms of continuing injunction to be agreed, limiting occupation to eight caravans.
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Planning Injunctions, Article 8 ECHR, Public Sector Equality Duty, Duty of Candour, Enforcement of Court Orders
Planning Law Civil Procedure Human Rights Contempt of Court Planning Injunctions Article 8 ECHR Public Sector Equality Duty Duty of Candour +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cheshire East Borough Council

Claimant

Mr Michael Maloney

Defendant

Mrs Sheila Maloney

Defendant

Mr Michael Maloney Senior

Defendant

Ms Bridget Maloney

Defendant

Ms Helen Lisa Maloney

Defendant

Persons Unknown Depositing Hardcore, Bringing Caravans and Residentially Occupying the Land on the South Side of Broadoak Lane, Mobberley, Knutsford, Cheshire

Defendant

Total Plant Hire

Defendant

Mr Thomas Haligan

Defendant

W Doherty & Sons Ltd

Defendant

Mr Paul Rennie

Defendant

Mr Glyn Parr

Defendant

Mr Adrian Draper

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Committal and Injunction Proceedings / Judgment After Contested Hearing on Contempt and Injunctive Relief

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Mr Maloney is in contempt of court for breach of interim injunctions
  2. 2 Appropriate terms and scope of continuing planning injunction

Ratio Decidendi

Mr Maloney was found in contempt of court for deliberate and knowing breaches of interim injunctions by encouraging and allowing prohibited development and additional caravans, with no credible excuse. The appropriate and proportionate injunction is to limit occupation to the eight caravans present at the time of the first order, not to reward disobedience by allowing the later five caravans to remain.

Court Disposition

Mr Maloney found in contempt of court on multiple allegations; terms of continuing injunction to be agreed, limiting occupation to eight caravans.

Orders

  • Case to be listed for further hearing on consequences of contempt findings with Mr Maloney in remote attendance.
  • Parties invited to agree terms of injunction reflecting findings; outstanding disputes to be resolved at next hearing.