Cheshire East Borough Council v Maloney & Ors [2021] EWHC 350 (QB) (16 February 2021)
Mr Maloney was found in contempt of court for knowingly and deliberately breaching the terms of interim injunctions by encouraging and allowing unauthorised development and the siting of additional caravans, despite being aware of the orders. The appropriate and proportionate response is to limit the number of caravans permitted on site to those present at the time of the first injunction, not to reward disobedience by allowing the later arrivals to remain.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 350 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Cheshire East Borough Council; Defendant: Mr Michael Maloney; Defendant: Mrs Sheila Maloney; Defendant: Mr Michael Maloney Senior; Defendant: Ms Bridget Maloney; Defendant: Ms Helen Lisa Maloney; Defendant: Persons Unknown Depositing Hardcore, Bringing Caravans and Residentially Occupying the Land on the South Side of Broadoak Lane, Mobberley, Knutsford, Cheshire; Defendant: Total Plant Hire; Defendant: Mr Thomas Haligan; Defendant: W Doherty & Sons Ltd; Defendant: Mr Paul Rennie; Defendant: Mr Glyn Parr; Defendant: Mr Adrian Draper
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Committal and Injunction Application / Post Interim Injunction, Final Determination of Contempt and Terms of Continuing Injunction
- Outcome
- Mr Maloney found in contempt of court on multiple allegations; terms of continuing injunction to be limited to eight caravans as present at the time of the first injunction; parties invited to agree terms of injunction reflecting these findings.
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Planning Injunctions, Article 8 ECHR, Public Sector Equality Duty, Children's Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cheshire East Borough Council
Claimant
Mr Michael Maloney
Defendant
Mrs Sheila Maloney
Defendant
Mr Michael Maloney Senior
Defendant
Ms Bridget Maloney
Defendant
Ms Helen Lisa Maloney
Defendant
Persons Unknown Depositing Hardcore, Bringing Caravans and Residentially Occupying the Land on the South Side of Broadoak Lane, Mobberley, Knutsford, Cheshire
Defendant
Total Plant Hire
Defendant
Mr Thomas Haligan
Defendant
W Doherty & Sons Ltd
Defendant
Mr Paul Rennie
Defendant
Mr Glyn Parr
Defendant
Mr Adrian Draper
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Committal and Injunction Application / Post Interim Injunction, Final Determination of Contempt and Terms of Continuing Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Maloney is in contempt of court for breach of interim injunctions
- 2 Appropriate terms and scope of continuing planning injunction
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Maloney was found in contempt of court for knowingly and deliberately breaching the terms of interim injunctions by encouraging and allowing unauthorised development and the siting of additional caravans, despite being aware of the orders. The appropriate and proportionate response is to limit the number of caravans permitted on site to those present at the time of the first injunction, not to reward disobedience by allowing the later arrivals to remain.
Court Disposition
Mr Maloney found in contempt of court on multiple allegations; terms of continuing injunction to be limited to eight caravans as present at the time of the first injunction; parties invited to agree terms of injunction reflecting these findings.
Orders
- Case to be listed for further hearing to address consequences of contempt findings with Mr Maloney in remote attendance.
- Continuing injunction to restrain further development and limit occupation to eight caravans; terms to be agreed or determined at next hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment