Cheshire East Borough Council v Maloney & Ors
Mr Maloney knowingly breached the terms of interim injunctions by encouraging and allowing prohibited development and siting additional caravans, and failed to remedy breaches within the required timeframe; the appropriate interim injunction should preserve the status quo prior to the breaches and limit occupation to the eight caravans present at the time of the first order.
- Parties
- Claimant: Cheshire East Borough Council; Defendant: Mr Michael Maloney; Defendant: Mrs Sheila Maloney; Defendant: Mr Michael Maloney Senior; Defendant: Ms Bridget Maloney; Defendant: Ms Helen Lisa Maloney; Defendant: Persons Unknown Depositing Hardcore, Bringing Caravans and Residentially Occupying the Land on the South Side of Broadoak Lane, Mobberley, Knutsford, Cheshire; Defendant: Total Plant Hire; Defendant: Mr Thomas Haligan; Defendant: W Doherty & Sons Ltd; Defendant: Mr Paul Rennie; Defendant: Mr Glyn Parr; Defendant: Mr Adrian Draper
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Mr Maloney found in contempt of court for specified breaches; terms of continuing injunction to be agreed by parties, limiting occupation to eight caravans.
- Legal Topics
- Injunctions, Breach of Planning Control, Article 8 ECHR, Public Sector Equality Duty, Duty of Candour
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cheshire East Borough Council
Claimant
Mr Michael Maloney
Defendant
Mrs Sheila Maloney
Defendant
Mr Michael Maloney Senior
Defendant
Ms Bridget Maloney
Defendant
Ms Helen Lisa Maloney
Defendant
Persons Unknown Depositing Hardcore, Bringing Caravans and Residentially Occupying the Land on the South Side of Broadoak Lane, Mobberley, Knutsford, Cheshire
Defendant
Total Plant Hire
Defendant
Mr Thomas Haligan
Defendant
W Doherty & Sons Ltd
Defendant
Mr Paul Rennie
Defendant
Mr Glyn Parr
Defendant
Mr Adrian Draper
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Maloney breached interim injunctions and is in contempt of court
- 2 Appropriate terms and scope of continuing injunction restraining breaches of planning control
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Maloney knowingly breached the terms of interim injunctions by encouraging and allowing prohibited development and siting additional caravans, and failed to remedy breaches within the required timeframe; the appropriate interim injunction should preserve the status quo prior to the breaches and limit occupation to the eight caravans present at the time of the first order.
Court Disposition
Mr Maloney found in contempt of court for specified breaches; terms of continuing injunction to be agreed by parties, limiting occupation to eight caravans.
Orders
- Mr Maloney found in contempt of court in respect of allegations 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9,13 and 14.
- Continuing injunction to limit occupation of site to eight caravans present at time of first order; parties to agree terms reflecting findings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment