194A Dawlish Road, Birmingham, West Midlands, B29 7AR ((Housing) Act 2004 and Housing and Planning Act 2016 - Rent repayment orders) [2022] UKFTT BIR_00CN_HMK_2022_0001 (22 June 2022)
The Tribunal found that the property was an unlicensed HMO and the respondent had committed an offence under section 72(1) of the Housing Act 2004, entitling the applicant to a rent repayment order.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] UKFTT BIR_00CN_HMK_2022_0001
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr. Mohammed Usman; Respondent: Mr. Mohammed Shafiq
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Rent Repayment Order Application / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Rent repayment order granted
- Legal Topics
- Rent Repayment Orders, Licensing of Houses in Multiple Occupation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr. Mohammed Usman
Applicant
Mr. Mohammed Shafiq
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Rent Repayment Order Application / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent was required to hold a licence for the property under the Housing Act 2004
- 2 Whether rent repayment order should be made under Housing and Planning Act 2016
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the property was an unlicensed HMO and the respondent had committed an offence under section 72(1) of the Housing Act 2004, entitling the applicant to a rent repayment order.
Court Disposition
Rent repayment order granted
Orders
- Respondent to pay applicant £4,800 as rent repayment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment