Financial Conduct Authority v Skinner & Ors
The court was satisfied, based on admissions and unchallenged evidence, that the claimant would obtain judgment for a substantial sum. The defendants failed to provide financial information despite clear instructions. The court exercised its discretion to order interim payments in reasonable proportions of the minimum sums likely to be found due at trial.
- Parties
- Claimant: Financial Conduct Authority; Defendants: Skinner & Others; Defendant: Mr Mongalar; Defendant: Mr Miller
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 January 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interim Application for Payment
- Outcome
- interim payment orders granted
- Legal Topics
- Interim Payments, FSMA Section 382, CPR 25.7(1)(c)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Financial Conduct Authority
Claimant
Skinner & Others
Defendants
Mr Mongalar
Defendant
Mr Miller
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interim Application for Payment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to an interim payment under CPR 25.7(1)(c) against the third, fourth, fifth and sixth defendants
- 2 What is a reasonable proportion of the likely final judgment amount for interim payment
Ratio Decidendi
The court was satisfied, based on admissions and unchallenged evidence, that the claimant would obtain judgment for a substantial sum. The defendants failed to provide financial information despite clear instructions. The court exercised its discretion to order interim payments in reasonable proportions of the minimum sums likely to be found due at trial.
Court Disposition
interim payment orders granted
Orders
- The two companies are jointly and severally liable for £150,000.
- Mr Mongalar is ordered to pay £100,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment