N Stubbs v Grafters Ltd
The employment tribunal erred in striking out the claim for unfair dismissal under section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996 on the basis of insufficient continuity of employment, as the two-year qualifying period does not apply to such claims. The ordinary unfair dismissal claim was correctly struck out due to lack...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr N Stubbs; Respondent: Grafters Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Strike Out
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Protected Disclosure, Continuity of Employment, Strike Out Procedure
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr N Stubbs
Appellant
Grafters Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Strike Out
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the employment tribunal erred in striking out the claim for unfair dismissal under section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996 due to insufficient continuity of employment
- 2 Whether the two-year qualifying period applies to claims under section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996
- 3 Whether the ordinary unfair dismissal claim was correctly struck out
Ratio Decidendi
The employment tribunal erred in striking out the claim for unfair dismissal under section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996 on the basis of insufficient continuity of employment, as the two-year qualifying period does not apply to such claims. The ordinary unfair dismissal claim was correctly struck out due to lack of two years' continuous employment.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- The claim for unfair dismissal based on making a protected disclosure under section 103A Employment Rights Act 1996 is remitted to the employment tribunal for further consideration.
- The claim for ordinary unfair dismissal remains struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment