Nicolas Burley v The Commissioners for HMRC
HMRC provided sufficiently detailed and cogent evidence of the production and posting of penalty notices, satisfying the presumption of service under the Interpretation Act 1978. Mr Burley failed to rebut this presumption; his evidence of non-receipt was not credible given the volume of other HMRC correspondence received and the absence of timely protest regarding non-receipt. The penalties were validly notified and upheld.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Nicolas Burley; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed except for daily penalties not pursued by HMRC, which are allowed by consent.
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Penalties, Service of Notices, Burden of Proof
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Nicolas Burley
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether HMRC adduced adequate evidence of system and posting of penalty notices
- 2 Whether the presumption of service under Interpretation Act 1978 section 7 was rebutted by the appellant
Ratio Decidendi
HMRC provided sufficiently detailed and cogent evidence of the production and posting of penalty notices, satisfying the presumption of service under the Interpretation Act 1978. Mr Burley failed to rebut this presumption; his evidence of non-receipt was not credible given the volume of other HMRC correspondence received and the absence of timely protest regarding non-receipt. The penalties were validly notified and upheld.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed except for daily penalties not pursued by HMRC, which are allowed by consent.
Orders
- Penalties upheld except for daily penalties of £900 imposed on 11 August 2017, which are set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment