Cooper, Re

Cooper, Re

The defendants discharged the burden of proving that Mrs Cooper had testamentary capacity and knew and approved the contents of the 2001 Will. There was no evidence of undue influence. The 2001 Will represents Mrs Cooper's testamentary intentions and is valid.

Parties
Claimant: Mrs Allen; Claimant: Mr Peter Rock; Defendant: Mr Norman Emery; Defendant: Mrs Margaret Emery
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
17 October 2005
Procedural Posture
Probate / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Claim dismissed; 2001 Will upheld.
Legal Topics
Testamentary Capacity, Knowledge and Approval, Undue Influence, Revocation of Will
Succession Probate Testamentary Capacity Knowledge and Approval Undue Influence Revocation of Will

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mrs Allen

Claimant

Mr Peter Rock

Claimant

Mr Norman Emery

Defendant

Mrs Margaret Emery

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Probate / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Mrs Cooper had testamentary capacity when executing the 2001 Will
  2. 2 Whether Mrs Cooper knew and approved the contents of the 2001 Will
  3. 3 Whether the 2001 Will was procured by undue influence

Ratio Decidendi

The defendants discharged the burden of proving that Mrs Cooper had testamentary capacity and knew and approved the contents of the 2001 Will. There was no evidence of undue influence. The 2001 Will represents Mrs Cooper's testamentary intentions and is valid.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed; 2001 Will upheld.

Orders

  • Pronouncement for the 2001 Will.