Paul John Calvert v Information Commissioner
The Tribunal has no jurisdiction under s.166 DPA 2018 to review the substantive outcome of the Commissioner's investigation; the applicant's challenge concerns the merits, not a procedural failing. The Commissioner discharged his statutory duty, and there is no realistic prospect of a s.166 direction being made.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr Paul John Calvert; Respondent: Information Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Information Rights Appeal / Strike Out Application
- Outcome
- Proceedings struck out
- Legal Topics
- UK GDPR Article 16, Data Rectification, Tribunal Jurisdiction, Procedural Fairness
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Paul John Calvert
Applicant
Information Commissioner
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Information Rights Appeal / Strike Out Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction under s.166 DPA 2018 to review the substantive outcome of the Information Commissioner's investigation
- 2 Whether the Commissioner failed to take appropriate procedural steps in handling the complaint
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal has no jurisdiction under s.166 DPA 2018 to review the substantive outcome of the Commissioner's investigation; the applicant's challenge concerns the merits, not a procedural failing. The Commissioner discharged his statutory duty, and there is no realistic prospect of a s.166 direction being made.
Court Disposition
Proceedings struck out
Orders
- The proceedings are struck out pursuant to rule 8(3)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment