Peffer v Rigg & Anor [1976] EWHC Ch 1 (17 March 1976)
The second defendant, having knowledge of the trust and not being a purchaser in good faith for valuable consideration, holds the property on constructive trust for herself and the plaintiff, and the land register should be rectified to reflect the plaintiff's half interest.
- Citation
- [1977] WLR 285
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Mr Peffer; First Defendant: Mr Rigg; Second Defendant: Mrs Rigg
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 1976
- Procedural Posture
- Breach of Trust Action / High Court (chancery Division) Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim for declaration and rectification granted; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Trust, Constructive Trust, Land Registration, Rectification of Register, Divorce Property Settlement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Peffer
Plaintiff
Mr Rigg
First Defendant
Mrs Rigg
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Breach of Trust Action / High Court (chancery Division) Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the letting of the top flat without the plaintiff's approval was a breach of trust
- 2 Whether the transfer of the whole beneficial interest to the second defendant defeated the plaintiff's interest under the Land Registration Act 1925
- 3 Whether the second defendant took the property free of the plaintiff's interest
Ratio Decidendi
The second defendant, having knowledge of the trust and not being a purchaser in good faith for valuable consideration, holds the property on constructive trust for herself and the plaintiff, and the land register should be rectified to reflect the plaintiff's half interest.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim for declaration and rectification granted; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Declaration that the second defendant holds half the property in trust for the plaintiff
- Rectification of the land register to show the plaintiff's half interest
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment