R v R (Family Court: Procedural Fairness)
The without notice order was wrongly granted on insufficient evidence, the order as drawn did not reflect the judge's intention, the respondent was denied a fair opportunity to challenge the order, and the court's refusal to grant relief from sanction was an error in law and procedure. The appeal was allowed and all previous orders were set aside.
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr R; Respondent: Mrs R
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Act 1996 Proceedings (non Molestation and Occupation Orders) / Appeal From Case Management Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; all previous orders set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Non Molestation Orders, Without Notice Applications, Case Management, Relief From Sanctions, Access to Children, Legal Aid Disparity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr R
Applicant
Mrs R
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Act 1996 Proceedings (non Molestation and Occupation Orders) / Appeal From Case Management Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the without notice non-molestation order was properly granted
- 2 Whether the respondent was denied a fair opportunity to challenge the order
- 3 Whether the court's case management and refusal of relief from sanction were justified
Ratio Decidendi
The without notice order was wrongly granted on insufficient evidence, the order as drawn did not reflect the judge's intention, the respondent was denied a fair opportunity to challenge the order, and the court's refusal to grant relief from sanction was an error in law and procedure. The appeal was allowed and all previous orders were set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; all previous orders set aside.
Orders
- All previous orders set aside.
- Proceedings resolved by undertakings and a child arrangements order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment