Jawad v Rahim [2000] EWCA Civ 313 (8 December 2000)
The Deputy Judge failed to provide sufficient reasons for preferring the Claimant's version of events and did not adequately address significant credibility issues and inconsistencies, thereby failing in the duty to give reasons. Justice requires that the judgment be set aside and the matter retried before a different judge.
- Citation
- [2000] EWCA Civ 313
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Rahim; Claimant/respondent: Mr Jawad
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 December 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Permission to Appeal and Substantive Appeal Against First Instance Judgment in Queen's Bench Division
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; order of the judge set aside; retrial ordered before a different judge.
- Legal Topics
- Appeals, Loan Repayment, Assessment of Witness Credibility, Duty to Give Reasons, Retrial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Rahim
Appellant
Mr Jawad
Claimant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Permission to Appeal and Substantive Appeal Against First Instance Judgment in Queen's Bench Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Deputy Judge gave adequate reasons for preferring the Claimant's evidence over the Appellant's
- 2 Whether the Deputy Judge properly assessed the credibility of the parties and witnesses
- 3 Whether the Deputy Judge failed to address material inconsistencies and documentary gaps
Ratio Decidendi
The Deputy Judge failed to provide sufficient reasons for preferring the Claimant's version of events and did not adequately address significant credibility issues and inconsistencies, thereby failing in the duty to give reasons. Justice requires that the judgment be set aside and the matter retried before a different judge.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; order of the judge set aside; retrial ordered before a different judge.
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted
- Order of the Deputy Judge set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment