Unite the Union v Freitas [2022] EWHC 666 (QB) (23 March 2022)
Given the gravity and extent of the defamatory allegations, their impact on Unite's reputation, and the defendant's conduct, an award of £50,000 in general damages is appropriate, and a permanent injunction is necessary to prevent further publication.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 666
- Parties
- Claimant: Unite the Union; Defendant: Mr Ricardo Freitas
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation and Harassment Claim / Remedies Hearing Following Summary Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; summary judgment for claimant; damages and injunction granted.
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Social Media Publication, Damages, Injunction, Freedom of Expression
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Unite the Union
Claimant
Mr Ricardo Freitas
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Defamation and Harassment Claim / Remedies Hearing Following Summary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate quantum of general damages for defamation against a trade union
- 2 Entitlement to and necessity of a permanent injunction restraining further publication
Ratio Decidendi
Given the gravity and extent of the defamatory allegations, their impact on Unite's reputation, and the defendant's conduct, an award of £50,000 in general damages is appropriate, and a permanent injunction is necessary to prevent further publication.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; summary judgment for claimant; damages and injunction granted.
Orders
- Defendant to pay £50,000 in general damages to claimant.
- Defendant permanently restrained from publishing the words complained of or any similar statements.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment