Unite the Union v Freitas [2022] EWHC 666 (QB) (23 March 2022)

Unite the Union v Freitas [2022] EWHC 666 (QB) (23 March 2022)

Given the gravity and extent of the defamatory allegations, their impact on Unite's reputation, and the defendant's conduct, an award of £50,000 in general damages is appropriate, and a permanent injunction is necessary to prevent further publication.

Citation
[2022] EWHC 666
Parties
Claimant: Unite the Union; Defendant: Mr Ricardo Freitas
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 March 2022
Procedural Posture
Defamation and Harassment Claim / Remedies Hearing Following Summary Judgment
Outcome
Claim allowed; summary judgment for claimant; damages and injunction granted.
Legal Topics
Libel, Social Media Publication, Damages, Injunction, Freedom of Expression

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Unite the Union

Claimant

Mr Ricardo Freitas

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Defamation and Harassment Claim / Remedies Hearing Following Summary Judgment

  1. 1 Appropriate quantum of general damages for defamation against a trade union
  2. 2 Entitlement to and necessity of a permanent injunction restraining further publication

Ratio Decidendi

Given the gravity and extent of the defamatory allegations, their impact on Unite's reputation, and the defendant's conduct, an award of £50,000 in general damages is appropriate, and a permanent injunction is necessary to prevent further publication.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed; summary judgment for claimant; damages and injunction granted.

Orders

  • Defendant to pay £50,000 in general damages to claimant.
  • Defendant permanently restrained from publishing the words complained of or any similar statements.