Keith Courtney v Richard Ronksley

Keith Courtney v Richard Ronksley

The claim was dismissed because the Claimant failed to provide any evidence, or a reasonable basis for expecting evidence at trial, that publication of the statement complained of caused or was likely to cause serious harm to his reputation in the minds of the identified publishees or through republication. The evidence from publishees was uniformly that the letter had no adverse impact on the Claimant's reputation. The claim did not meet the statutory threshold for serious harm and had no real prospect of success.

Parties
Claimant: Mr Keith Courtney; Defendant: Mr Richard Ronksley
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 December 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Defamation (libel) / Summary Judgment Application by Defendant
Outcome
Claim dismissed (summary judgment for Defendant)
Legal Topics
Serious Harm Threshold, Summary Judgment, Strike Out, Publication to Limited Class, Reputational Harm, Privilege
Defamation Media Law Serious Harm Threshold Summary Judgment Strike Out Publication to Limited Class Reputational Harm Privilege

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Keith Courtney

Claimant

Mr Richard Ronksley

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Defamation (libel) / Summary Judgment Application by Defendant

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the publication of the statement complained of caused or is likely to cause serious harm to the claimant's reputation under s.1(1) Defamation Act 2013
  2. 2 Whether the claim should be summarily dismissed for lack of real prospect of success on serious harm
  3. 3 Whether parts of the claim should be struck out for disclosing no reasonable grounds or as an abuse of process

Ratio Decidendi

The claim was dismissed because the Claimant failed to provide any evidence, or a reasonable basis for expecting evidence at trial, that publication of the statement complained of caused or was likely to cause serious harm to his reputation in the minds of the identified publishees or through republication. The evidence from publishees was uniformly that the letter had no adverse impact on the Claimant's reputation. The claim did not meet the statutory threshold for serious harm and had no real prospect of success.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed (summary judgment for Defendant)

Orders

  • Summary judgment granted in favour of the Defendant
  • Claim dismissed in its entirety