Tibbs v Tibbs & Anor [2020] EWHC 1853 (Ch) (19 February 2020)
Permission is granted to adduce the late witness statement and signed documents because, despite the serious and unexplained breach, the prejudice to the defendants is limited, the documents are fundamental to the issues, and justice requires their admission under the Denton principles and the court's discretion.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 1853 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr John Tibbs; Defendant: Mr Robert Tibbs; Defendant: Ms Ann Lesley Tibbs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Inquiry and Account (chancery Division) / Mid Trial Application for Permission to Adduce Late Evidence
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Documents, Relief From Sanctions, Admissibility of Evidence, Overriding Objective, Mortgage/charge Documentation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr John Tibbs
Claimant
Mr Robert Tibbs
Defendant
Ms Ann Lesley Tibbs
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Inquiry and Account (chancery Division) / Mid Trial Application for Permission to Adduce Late Evidence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant permission to rely on late evidence (signed facility letter and all-moneys charge)
- 2 Whether relief from sanctions is required for late disclosure
- 3 Whether the late evidence causes prejudice to the defendants
Ratio Decidendi
Permission is granted to adduce the late witness statement and signed documents because, despite the serious and unexplained breach, the prejudice to the defendants is limited, the documents are fundamental to the issues, and justice requires their admission under the Denton principles and the court's discretion.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Permission granted to rely on the third witness statement of Jason Ferrando and the signed facility letter and all-moneys charge as evidence.
- Documents to be added by way of a supplementary list.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment