Rajabieslami v Tariverdi & Ors [2024] EWHC 1030 (Comm) (08 May 2024)
The Declaration of Trust and Amendment were genuine and effective to create a bare trust over the shares in Desero for the claimant. The Rug Transaction Documents were forgeries and no consideration was given for the transfer of shares. The defendants, by selling the vessel without the claimant's consent, committed a breach of trust. The claimant is entitled to equitable compensation for the value of the vessel at the date of sale and profits made from unauthorised use.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 1030 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Dr Morteza Rajabieslami; Defendant: Mr Sam Tariverdi; Defendant: Melousa Inc; Defendant: Passa Navigation Inc
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Claim / Final Judgment After Trial; Defendants Debarred From Defending Due to Non Compliance With Unless Order
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; judgment for claimant
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Trust, Beneficial Ownership, Forgery, Equitable Compensation, Ship Sale, Document Authenticity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr Morteza Rajabieslami
Claimant
Mr Sam Tariverdi
Defendant
Melousa Inc
Defendant
Passa Navigation Inc
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Claim / Final Judgment After Trial; Defendants Debarred From Defending Due to Non Compliance With Unless Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Declaration of Trust and Amendment are genuine and effective to create a trust over Desero shares for the claimant
- 2 Whether the Rug Transaction Documents are genuine or forgeries
- 3 Whether the sale of the vessel constituted a breach of trust
Ratio Decidendi
The Declaration of Trust and Amendment were genuine and effective to create a bare trust over the shares in Desero for the claimant. The Rug Transaction Documents were forgeries and no consideration was given for the transfer of shares. The defendants, by selling the vessel without the claimant's consent, committed a breach of trust. The claimant is entitled to equitable compensation for the value of the vessel at the date of sale and profits made from unauthorised use.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; judgment for claimant
Orders
- Defendants to pay claimant US$ 12,279,568.15 as equitable compensation for breach of trust
- No order for reconstitution of trust or redelivery of vessel
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment