EMW Law LLP v Halborg
The without prejudice rule does not entitle Mr Halborg to withhold Class A Documents from EMW due to exceptions for disputes about settlement and reasonableness of conduct; Class B Documents are relevant and must be disclosed. Legal professional privilege was not waived regarding Class C and D Documents, so disclosure of those is not required.
- Parties
- Claimant: EMW Law LLP; Defendant: Mr Scott Halborg
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Disclosure Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in part.
- Legal Topics
- Without Prejudice Rule, Disclosure, Solicitor Agent Relationship, Conditional Fee Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
EMW Law LLP
Claimant
Mr Scott Halborg
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Disclosure Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Applicability of the without prejudice rule to disclosure of documents between solicitor, agent, and third parties
- 2 Relevance of various classes of documents to breach of contract claim
- 3 Waiver of legal professional privilege in solicitor-agent context
Ratio Decidendi
The without prejudice rule does not entitle Mr Halborg to withhold Class A Documents from EMW due to exceptions for disputes about settlement and reasonableness of conduct; Class B Documents are relevant and must be disclosed. Legal professional privilege was not waived regarding Class C and D Documents, so disclosure of those is not required.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in part.
Orders
- Mr Halborg must disclose Class A and B Documents to EMW.
- Appeal allowed regarding Class C and D Documents; disclosure not required.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment