Birmingham City Council v Afsar & Ors
In the circumstances, the Council should provide undertakings in damages as a proportionate and fair mechanism for resolving any claims for loss caused by the injunctions, given the nature of the action, the affected parties, and the limited likelihood of material loss.
- Parties
- Claimant: Birmingham City Council; Defendant: Mr Shakeel Afsar; Defendant: Ms Rosina Afsar; Defendant: Mr Amir Ahmed; Defendant: Persons Unknown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Judgment Order Regarding Undertakings in Damages
- Outcome
- Council required to provide undertakings in damages in the usual form.
- Legal Topics
- Injunctions, Undertakings in Damages, Article 10 Rights, Protection From Harassment Act, Local Government Act, Public Authority Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Birmingham City Council
Claimant
Mr Shakeel Afsar
Defendant
Ms Rosina Afsar
Defendant
Mr Amir Ahmed
Defendant
Persons Unknown
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Judgment Order Regarding Undertakings in Damages
Legal Issues
- 1 Should Birmingham City Council be required to give undertakings in damages for injunctions granted against defendants and third parties?
Ratio Decidendi
In the circumstances, the Council should provide undertakings in damages as a proportionate and fair mechanism for resolving any claims for loss caused by the injunctions, given the nature of the action, the affected parties, and the limited likelihood of material loss.
Court Disposition
Council required to provide undertakings in damages in the usual form.
Orders
- Council to comply with any order for compensation if the injunctions cause loss to any defendant or third party.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment