Treo Noal GP SARL & Ors v Kowski & Ors [2026] EWHC 487 (Comm) (26 February 2026)
The court determined that disclosure should be ordered on all pleaded and material issues, applying the principles of proportionality and relevance under PD 57AD. Model D disclosure was ordered for most key issues, with Model B or C applied where appropriate. Issues not central or not pleaded were excluded from disclosure. The court adopted clear, focused formulations for each disclosure issue, rejecting unnecessary expansion or duplication.
- Citation
- [2026] EWHC 487 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: TREO NOAL GP S.à r.l; Claimant: NOAL SCSp (acting by its managing general partner TREO NOAL GP S.à r.l); Claimant: NORTHPOLE HOLDCO S.à r.l; Claimant: NORTHPOLE BIDCO S.à r.l; Defendant: Mr Stefan Emanuel Kowski; Defendant: Mr Stephen Mark Peel; Defendant: Mr Bastian Frederik Lueken
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 February 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court (kbd) Disclosure Guidance Hearing / Post Case Management Conference, Disclosure Guidance Hearing
- Outcome
- Disclosure guidance given; specific disclosure issues approved, some rejected.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Unlawful Means Conspiracy, Bribery, Valuation of Assets, Fund Management, ESG Concerns
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TREO NOAL GP S.à r.l
Claimant
NOAL SCSp (acting by its managing general partner TREO NOAL GP S.à r.l)
Claimant
NORTHPOLE HOLDCO S.à r.l
Claimant
NORTHPOLE BIDCO S.à r.l
Claimant
Mr Stefan Emanuel Kowski
Defendant
Mr Stephen Mark Peel
Defendant
Mr Bastian Frederik Lueken
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court (kbd) Disclosure Guidance Hearing / Post Case Management Conference, Disclosure Guidance Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Defendants' involvement in 1 February 2019 Recommendation Letter
- 2 Defendants' belief in truth of NoA representations
- 3 Reliance by LPs on NoA representations
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that disclosure should be ordered on all pleaded and material issues, applying the principles of proportionality and relevance under PD 57AD. Model D disclosure was ordered for most key issues, with Model B or C applied where appropriate. Issues not central or not pleaded were excluded from disclosure. The court adopted clear, focused formulations for each disclosure issue, rejecting unnecessary expansion or duplication.
Court Disposition
Disclosure guidance given; specific disclosure issues approved, some rejected.
Orders
- Issue 4 included as a separate disclosure issue.
- Issue 9 reformulated and included; issue 18 struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment