Barclays Bank Plc v Guy
The transfer to Ten Acre was voidable, not void, and had not been avoided at the time the charge was granted and registered. Ten Acre was the registered proprietor and entitled to grant the charge. No mistake in registration was shown, and rectification cannot affect the claimant's charge. The doctrine of notice is irrelevant in this context.
- Parties
- Claimant: Barclays Bank Plc; Defendant: Mr Trevor Guy
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 January 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Summary Judgment Application
- Outcome
- summary judgment granted for claimant
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Land Register, Validity of Legal Charge, Voidable Vs Void Transfer, Priority of Interests, Doctrine of Notice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Barclays Bank Plc
Claimant
Mr Trevor Guy
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Summary Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Barclays Bank Plc is entitled to sell the property free of any interest of Mr Trevor Guy
- 2 Whether the charge is a genuine legal document
- 3 Whether the transfer to Ten Acre was fraudulently procured and void or voidable
Ratio Decidendi
The transfer to Ten Acre was voidable, not void, and had not been avoided at the time the charge was granted and registered. Ten Acre was the registered proprietor and entitled to grant the charge. No mistake in registration was shown, and rectification cannot affect the claimant's charge. The doctrine of notice is irrelevant in this context.
Court Disposition
summary judgment granted for claimant
Orders
- Barclays Bank Plc is entitled to sell the property free of any interest, right or claim of Mr Trevor Guy
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment