Bruce v Chamberlain & Anor Rev 1 [2004] EWCA Civ 1047 (29 July 2004)
The duty to make reasonable adjustments under sections 5(2) and 6 of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 does not arise where the selection criteria for a job are not related to the applicant's disability; therefore, the claim that the employer should have adjusted the criteria to accommodate Mr. Bruce's lack of experience was misconceived and had no reasonable prospect of success.
- Citation
- [2004] EWCA Civ 1047
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr V M S Bruce; 1st Respondent: Mr A M J Chamberlain; 2nd Respondent: Addleshaw Goddard & Co
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal (civil Division)
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Reasonable Adjustments, Disability Discrimination Act 1995, Selection Criteria in Recruitment, Victimisation, Doctrine of Precedent
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr V M S Bruce
Appellant
Mr A M J Chamberlain
1st Respondent
Addleshaw Goddard & Co
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal (civil Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the employer was under a duty to make reasonable adjustments to selection criteria under sections 5(2) and 6 of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995
- 2 Whether there must be a causal connection between the disability and the disadvantage caused by selection criteria
- 3 Whether the previous EAT decision in Bruce v Cavalier and Thompsons is binding and applicable
Ratio Decidendi
The duty to make reasonable adjustments under sections 5(2) and 6 of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 does not arise where the selection criteria for a job are not related to the applicant's disability; therefore, the claim that the employer should have adjusted the criteria to accommodate Mr. Bruce's lack of experience was misconceived and had no reasonable prospect of success.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal is refused.
- Permission to appeal to the House of Lords is formally refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment