Green v Briscoe

Green v Briscoe

Mrs Green does not technically have an interest in the estate sufficient to challenge the will, but given the evidence from attesting witnesses, the matter should be adjudicated on the counterclaim for the administration of justice.

Parties
Claimant: Mrs Green; Defendant: Mrs Briscoe
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 March 2005
Procedural Posture
Probate and Inheritance Dispute / Case Management Conference
Outcome
Matter to be tried on the counterclaim; discontinuance not permitted.
Legal Topics
Validity of Will, Undue Influence, Reasonable Financial Provision, Interest in Estate
Probate Inheritance Family Law Validity of Will Undue Influence Reasonable Financial Provision Interest in Estate

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mrs Green

Claimant

Mrs Briscoe

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Probate and Inheritance Dispute / Case Management Conference

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Mrs Green has sufficient interest to challenge the validity of the will
  2. 2 Whether the will of Mr Green dated 25 November 2003 was properly executed
  3. 3 Whether Mrs Green is entitled to reasonable financial provision under the Inheritance Act

Ratio Decidendi

Mrs Green does not technically have an interest in the estate sufficient to challenge the will, but given the evidence from attesting witnesses, the matter should be adjudicated on the counterclaim for the administration of justice.

Court Disposition

Matter to be tried on the counterclaim; discontinuance not permitted.

Orders

  • Trial to proceed in the trial window on the date obtained by the parties.
  • Discontinuance of the counterclaim not permitted.