VAC v JAD & Ors [2010] EWCOP 2159 (16 August 2010)

VAC v JAD & Ors [2010] EWCOP 2159 (16 August 2010)

The Court of Protection may authorise a statutory will for a protected person where there is uncertainty or dispute as to the validity of recent wills, provided that, after considering all relevant circumstances and applying the structured best interests test, it is objectively in the protected person's best interests to do so. In this case, doubts about the validity of the 2004 and 2006 wills, the agreement of all parties, and the alignment of the proposed statutory will with Mrs D's earlier wishes justified the order.

Citation
[2010] EWCOP 2159
Parties
Applicant: Mrs C; Respondent (protected Person): Mrs D; Respondent: Mr D; Respondent: Mrs S
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 August 2010
Procedural Posture
Court of Protection Statutory Will Application / Final Hearing (on Paper)
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Statutory Wills, Testamentary Capacity, Best Interests, Court of Protection Jurisdiction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mrs C

Applicant

Mrs D

Respondent (protected Person)

Mr D

Respondent

Mrs S

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Court of Protection Statutory Will Application / Final Hearing (on Paper)

  1. 1 Whether the Court of Protection should authorise the execution of a statutory will for a protected person where there is a dispute or uncertainty as to the validity of recent wills
  2. 2 What factors determine the protected person's best interests in the context of a statutory will

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Protection may authorise a statutory will for a protected person where there is uncertainty or dispute as to the validity of recent wills, provided that, after considering all relevant circumstances and applying the structured best interests test, it is objectively in the protected person's best interests to do so. In this case, doubts about the validity of the 2004 and 2006 wills, the agreement of all parties, and the alignment of the proposed statutory will with Mrs D's earlier wishes justified the order.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Mrs D's deputy is authorised to execute a statutory will in the agreed terms on Mrs D's behalf.
  • The statutory will is to be held in safe custody by the deputy's solicitors, subject to Court directions during Mrs D's lifetime.