Burns v Burns
Although the wife demonstrated that the consent order required review due to subsequent events and the husband's conduct, her right to review was forfeited by her and her advisers' failure to act promptly, as required by the Barder principles. The delay of approximately three years was unjustified and fatal to her application.
- Parties
- Applicant: Mrs Christine Burns; Respondent: Mr John Burns
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (family/ancillary Relief) / Application for Extension of Time and Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time refused; application for permission to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Consent Orders, Duty of Candour, Delay in Appeals, Setting Aside Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Christine Burns
Applicant
Mr John Burns
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (family/ancillary Relief) / Application for Extension of Time and Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the consent order in ancillary relief should be set aside due to misrepresentation, breach of duty of candour, or supervening event
- 2 Whether the application to appeal was made reasonably promptly as required by the Barder principles
Ratio Decidendi
Although the wife demonstrated that the consent order required review due to subsequent events and the husband's conduct, her right to review was forfeited by her and her advisers' failure to act promptly, as required by the Barder principles. The delay of approximately three years was unjustified and fatal to her application.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time refused; application for permission to appeal refused.
Orders
- Application for extension of time refused.
- Application for permission to appeal refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment