Burns v Burns

Burns v Burns

Although the wife demonstrated that the consent order required review due to subsequent events and the husband's conduct, her right to review was forfeited by her and her advisers' failure to act promptly, as required by the Barder principles. The delay of approximately three years was unjustified and fatal to her application.

Parties
Applicant: Mrs Christine Burns; Respondent: Mr John Burns
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 July 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (family/ancillary Relief) / Application for Extension of Time and Permission to Appeal
Outcome
Application for extension of time refused; application for permission to appeal refused.
Legal Topics
Ancillary Relief, Consent Orders, Duty of Candour, Delay in Appeals, Setting Aside Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mrs Christine Burns

Applicant

Mr John Burns

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal (family/ancillary Relief) / Application for Extension of Time and Permission to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the consent order in ancillary relief should be set aside due to misrepresentation, breach of duty of candour, or supervening event
  2. 2 Whether the application to appeal was made reasonably promptly as required by the Barder principles

Ratio Decidendi

Although the wife demonstrated that the consent order required review due to subsequent events and the husband's conduct, her right to review was forfeited by her and her advisers' failure to act promptly, as required by the Barder principles. The delay of approximately three years was unjustified and fatal to her application.

Court Disposition

Application for extension of time refused; application for permission to appeal refused.

Orders

  • Application for extension of time refused.
  • Application for permission to appeal refused.