Re B (Children) [2007] EWCA Civ 921 (21 February 2007)
The indemnity costs order was set aside because it was based on the erroneous assumption that the mother had not participated in the proceedings, when in fact she had communicated with the court and provided a medical certificate. The judge's failure to consider this material rendered the costs order unjustified.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] EWCA Civ 921
- Parties
- Appellant: Mrs H; Respondent: Father (name not specified)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Appeal / Appeal From High Court (family Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Costs in Children Act Proceedings, Indemnity Costs, Litigant in Person, Procedural Fairness
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs H
Appellant
Father (name not specified)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal / Appeal From High Court (family Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the order for indemnity costs against the mother in Children Act proceedings was justified
- 2 Whether the judge erred in concluding the mother had not participated in proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The indemnity costs order was set aside because it was based on the erroneous assumption that the mother had not participated in the proceedings, when in fact she had communicated with the court and provided a medical certificate. The judge's failure to consider this material rendered the costs order unjustified.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted
- Appeal allowed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment