Khan & Anor v The Home Office

Khan & Anor v The Home Office

The Employment Tribunal did not err in law in its approach to the burden of proof or in its reasoning. It was entitled to find, on the evidence, that the respondent's actions regarding dismissal, pay, special leave, and CSCS compensation were not motivated by race or sex discrimination. The Tribunal's reasons were legally sufficient, and its findings on remedy, including refusal of compensation for loss of career, were justified and in accordance with established legal principles.

Parties
Appellant: Mrs Iris Odette King; Appellant: Mrs Marti Khan; Respondent: The Home Office
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 May 2008
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; applications for permission to appeal refused.
Legal Topics
Race Discrimination, Sex Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Burden of Proof, Remedies
Employment Law Discrimination Law Race Discrimination Sex Discrimination Unfair Dismissal Burden of Proof Remedies

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mrs Iris Odette King

Appellant

Mrs Marti Khan

Appellant

The Home Office

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law in rejecting claims of race and sex discrimination in relation to dismissal, pay, special leave, and CSCS compensation.
  2. 2 Whether the Employment Tribunal failed to apply the correct burden of proof as required by statute and case law.
  3. 3 Whether the Employment Tribunal provided sufficient reasons for its findings.

Ratio Decidendi

The Employment Tribunal did not err in law in its approach to the burden of proof or in its reasoning. It was entitled to find, on the evidence, that the respondent's actions regarding dismissal, pay, special leave, and CSCS compensation were not motivated by race or sex discrimination. The Tribunal's reasons were legally sufficient, and its findings on remedy, including refusal of compensation for loss of career, were justified and in accordance with established legal principles.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; applications for permission to appeal refused.

Orders

  • Appeals dismissed.
  • Applications for permission to appeal refused.