J Davies v EE Limited
The Employment Tribunal erred in law by failing to find that the PCP of requiring the claimant to work a 40-hour week was applied to her during the relevant period. The existence of part-time roles, adjustments during phased return, or the possibility of future part-time roles did not negate the application of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mrs J Davies; Respondent: EE Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 December 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; matter remitted
- Legal Topics
- Reasonable Adjustments, Provision Criterion or Practice (pcp), Constructive Dismissal, Equality Act 2010
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs J Davies
Appellant
EE Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law in finding that the PCP of requiring the claimant to work 40 hours per week was not applied to her
- 2 Whether the existence of part-time roles or adjustments negated the application of the PCP
- 3 Whether the Tribunal failed to consider the correct period for application of the PCP
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal erred in law by failing to find that the PCP of requiring the claimant to work a 40-hour week was applied to her during the relevant period. The existence of part-time roles, adjustments during phased return, or the possibility of future part-time roles did not negate the application of the PCP. The Tribunal's error was fundamental and required remission to a newly constituted Tribunal.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; matter remitted
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The claims of failure to make reasonable adjustments and constructive dismissal are remitted to a newly constituted Employment Tribunal for reconsideration.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment