Chambers-Mills v Allied Bakeries
Permission to appeal was granted because the appellant had a real prospect of success on the basis that the Employment Tribunal may have failed to consider the removal of the 'unless' aspect of the order, did not give the appellant proper notice or opportunity to respond to the strike out application, and may have proceeded in ignorance of material facts, thereby causing procedural unfairness.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mrs P Chambers-Mills; Respondent: Allied Bakeries
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (oral Renewal)
- Outcome
- permission to appeal granted (except on two grounds)
- Legal Topics
- Strike Out Applications, Procedural Fairness, Case Management, Disability Discrimination, Adjournment, Expert Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs P Chambers-Mills
Appellant
Allied Bakeries
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (oral Renewal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in striking out the appellant’s Disability Discrimination Act claims for failure to comply with orders
- 2 Whether the appellant had proper notice and opportunity to respond to the strike out application
- 3 Whether the removal of the 'unless' aspect of the order was material and properly considered
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal was granted because the appellant had a real prospect of success on the basis that the Employment Tribunal may have failed to consider the removal of the 'unless' aspect of the order, did not give the appellant proper notice or opportunity to respond to the strike out application, and may have proceeded in ignorance of material facts, thereby causing procedural unfairness.
Court Disposition
permission to appeal granted (except on two grounds)
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted on all grounds except (1) failure to consider psychological condition and (12) proceeding without joint expert evidence; permission refused on those two grounds.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment