Taylor, Re

Taylor, Re

There were no grounds for challenging the decisions made by District Judge Maple, no evidence of procedural irregularity, and no important point of principle or compelling reason to justify a second appeal. The application for permission to appeal was refused.

Parties
Applicant: Mrs. Rita Taylor; Respondent: Mr. Colin Taylor
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 May 2006
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
Outcome
Application for permission to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Ancillary Relief, Periodical Payments, Non Molestation Orders, Occupation Orders, Appeals Procedure
Family Law Ancillary Relief Periodical Payments Non Molestation Orders Occupation Orders Appeals Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mrs. Rita Taylor

Applicant

Mr. Colin Taylor

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family Law Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Mrs. Taylor should be granted permission to appeal out of time against the order of District Judge Maple
  2. 2 Whether there were grounds to reopen the periodical payments order or other financial orders
  3. 3 Whether there was a failure of service of documents justifying appeal

Ratio Decidendi

There were no grounds for challenging the decisions made by District Judge Maple, no evidence of procedural irregularity, and no important point of principle or compelling reason to justify a second appeal. The application for permission to appeal was refused.

Court Disposition

Application for permission to appeal refused

Orders

  • Permission to appeal refused