Glen Haysman v Mrs Rogers Films Ltd
The claimant is entitled to recover the VAT-inclusive cost of repairs, damages for non-pecuniary loss due to inconvenience and distress, and loss of earnings for a reasonable period spent dealing with the damage. No deduction for betterment is appropriate as the repairs restore the property to its prior condition....
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Glen Haysman; Defendant: Mrs Rogers Films Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Damages, Breach of Contract, Non Pecuniary Loss, Loss of Earnings, Betterment, Mitigation of Loss
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Glen Haysman
Claimant
Mrs Rogers Films Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to damages for breach of a film location agreement, including for property damage, non-pecuniary loss, loss of earnings, security costs, and loss of a chance.
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant is entitled to recover the VAT-inclusive cost of repairs, damages for non-pecuniary loss due to inconvenience and distress, and loss of earnings for a reasonable period spent dealing with the damage. No deduction for betterment is appropriate as the repairs restore the property to its prior condition. The claims for security costs and loss of a chance are rejected as not foreseeable or causally linked to the breach.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part
Orders
- Judgment for the claimant in the sum of £78,941.70 exclusive of interest.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment