T (a child), Re

T (a child), Re

The judge's exercise of discretion in awarding costs against the mother was proper because her conduct in relation to the litigation was unreasonable, leading to unnecessary hearings and costs, and not justified by her personality or anxieties. The appeal against the costs order is dismissed.

Parties
Applicant: Mrs. ST; Respondent: Mr. DT
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 March 2005
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Child Residence, Contact Orders, Costs in Children's Proceedings
Family Law Child Residence Contact Orders Costs in Children's Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mrs. ST

Applicant

Mr. DT

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether costs should be awarded against a parent in private law proceedings relating to children
  2. 2 Whether the mother's conduct in litigation was unreasonable so as to justify a costs order

Ratio Decidendi

The judge's exercise of discretion in awarding costs against the mother was proper because her conduct in relation to the litigation was unreasonable, leading to unnecessary hearings and costs, and not justified by her personality or anxieties. The appeal against the costs order is dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Costs orders against the mother for the hearings in December 2002, May 2003, and August 2003 stand
  • Mother to pay the father's costs of the application for costs, subject to detailed assessment by the costs judge