Stonegate Pub Company Ltd v Ms Amlin Corporate Member Ltd & Ors [2022] EWHC 2548 (Comm) (17 October 2022)
The number of triggers under the policy depends on the specific insuring clause: for the Disease Peril, each case of COVID-19 at or in the vicinity of an insured location is a trigger; for Enforced Closure, each closure of an insured location is a trigger, but repeated closures without reopening do not create new...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 2548 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Stonegate Pub Company Limited; Defendant: MS Amlin Corporate Member Limited; Defendant: Liberty Mutual Insurance Europe SE; Defendant: Zurich Insurance PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Insurance Claim / Stage 1 Trial on Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Stage 1 issues determined; partial judgment for defendants on aggregation and government support offset issues; other issues reserved for later determination.
- Legal Topics
- Business Interruption Insurance, Policy Construction, Aggregation Clauses, COVID 19 Pandemic Losses, Causation, Government Support Offsets
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stonegate Pub Company Limited
Claimant
MS Amlin Corporate Member Limited
Defendant
Liberty Mutual Insurance Europe SE
Defendant
Zurich Insurance PLC
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Insurance Claim / Stage 1 Trial on Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 What triggers coverage under the relevant insuring clauses of the policy?
- 2 How should business interruption losses be aggregated for the purposes of policy limits?
- 3 Are government support payments (furlough, business rates relief) deductible from recoverable losses?
Ratio Decidendi
The number of triggers under the policy depends on the specific insuring clause: for the Disease Peril, each case of COVID-19 at or in the vicinity of an insured location is a trigger; for Enforced Closure, each closure of an insured location is a trigger, but repeated closures without reopening do not create new triggers; for Prevention of Access, each materially different government action or advice is a trigger, not multiplied by the number of premises. Aggregation for policy limits is determined by the degree of unity in cause, locality, and time, with a significant causal link required. Government support payments (furlough, business rates relief) are to be taken into account for the...
Court Disposition
Stage 1 issues determined; partial judgment for defendants on aggregation and government support offset issues; other issues reserved for later determination.
Orders
- Business interruption losses to be aggregated according to the court's construction of 'occurrence' and SBIL.
- Government support payments (furlough, business rates relief) must be deducted from recoverable losses.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment