H (Children), Re

H (Children), Re

The judge was entitled to proceed with the application at the directions hearing and refuse it, given the broad discretion afforded in such cases, the lack of sufficient change in circumstances, and the paramountcy of the children's welfare. The parents' recovery timescale was not consistent with the children's needs.

Parties
Applicant: Ms F; Applicant: Mr H; First Respondent: Local Authority
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 November 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Care Orders, Placement Orders, Revocation of Placement Orders, Parental Drug Addiction, Adoption
Family Law Child Law Care Orders Placement Orders Revocation of Placement Orders Parental Drug Addiction Adoption

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ms F

Applicant

Mr H

Applicant

Local Authority

First Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal and Substantive Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the judge erred in refusing to revoke placement orders for the applicants' children at a directions hearing without awaiting further medical evidence
  2. 2 Whether the judge exercised his discretion properly in proceeding with the application summarily

Ratio Decidendi

The judge was entitled to proceed with the application at the directions hearing and refuse it, given the broad discretion afforded in such cases, the lack of sufficient change in circumstances, and the paramountcy of the children's welfare. The parents' recovery timescale was not consistent with the children's needs.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Permission to appeal granted
  • Appeal dismissed