N-O (Children)

N-O (Children)

The application for permission to appeal is refused because the orders were interim, subject to imminent review, and the judge acted within his discretion based on the evidence before him.

Parties
Appellant: Ms G; Father of M and C: SO; Father of CH: SFN; Local Authority: Gloucestershire County Council
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 February 2008
Procedural Posture
Child Residence and Care Proceedings / Application for Permission to Appeal Interim Orders
Outcome
applications refused
Legal Topics
Interim Care Orders, Residence Orders, Appeals, Judicial Discretion
Family Law Child Law Interim Care Orders Residence Orders Appeals Judicial Discretion

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ms G

Appellant

SO

Father of M and C

SFN

Father of CH

Gloucestershire County Council

Local Authority

Procedural Posture

Child Residence and Care Proceedings / Application for Permission to Appeal Interim Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the judge erred in making interim residence and care orders removing children from the mother
  2. 2 Whether the application for permission to appeal is premature

Ratio Decidendi

The application for permission to appeal is refused because the orders were interim, subject to imminent review, and the judge acted within his discretion based on the evidence before him.

Court Disposition

applications refused

Orders

  • Applications for permission to appeal refused
  • Judgment to be transcribed and sent to Ms G at public expense