Ghosh v Hellmonds & Anor

Ghosh v Hellmonds & Anor

The appeal raises no question of law as the Employment Tribunal's findings were based on evidence, and the applicant's disagreement is with the assessment of facts, not law. The test for perversity is not met.

Parties
Applicant: Ms Ghosh; Respondents: Mr Hellmonds and another
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 February 2013
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome
application refused
Legal Topics
Unfair Dismissal, Race Discrimination, Appeals, Perversity of Findings
Employment Law Unfair Dismissal Race Discrimination Appeals Perversity of Findings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ms Ghosh

Applicant

Mr Hellmonds and another

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal's findings were perverse
  2. 2 Whether the dismissal of Ms Ghosh was unfair
  3. 3 Whether there was race discrimination

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal raises no question of law as the Employment Tribunal's findings were based on evidence, and the applicant's disagreement is with the assessment of facts, not law. The test for perversity is not met.

Court Disposition

application refused

Orders

  • permission to appeal refused