Chapman & Anor v Simon [1993] EWCA Civ 37 (26 November 1993)
The Court of Appeal held that the Industrial Tribunal erred in law by finding racial discrimination without primary facts to support an inference of subconscious or unconscious racial prejudice, and by considering acts not complained of in the originating application. The appeal was allowed and Ms Simon's complaint dismissed.
- Citation
- [1993] EWCA Civ 37
- Parties
- Applicant: Ms Irene E Simon; Respondent: Ms Chapman; Respondent: London Borough of Tower Hamlets (successor to ILEA)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed, cross-appeal dismissed, complaint of racial discrimination dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Racial Discrimination, Race Relations Act 1976, Industrial Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms Irene E Simon
Applicant
Ms Chapman
Respondent
London Borough of Tower Hamlets (successor to ILEA)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Ms Simon was subjected to unlawful racial discrimination by Ms Chapman and ILEA under the Race Relations Act 1976
- 2 Whether the Industrial Tribunal erred in finding racial discrimination based on prejudgment and failure to provide an open report
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that the Industrial Tribunal erred in law by finding racial discrimination without primary facts to support an inference of subconscious or unconscious racial prejudice, and by considering acts not complained of in the originating application. The appeal was allowed and Ms Simon's complaint dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed, cross-appeal dismissed, complaint of racial discrimination dismissed.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment